Alignment between Course Syllabi (PEA) and Learning Outcomes (RdA) in technological higher education in accounting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63207/gww5bw28Keywords:
curriculum evaluation, technological higher education, accounting education, learning outcomes, constructive alignment, course syllabiAbstract
This article presents a critical documentary analysis of the alignment between Course Syllabi (PEA, in Spanish) and Learning Outcomes (RdA, in Spanish) in a technological accounting career program in Latin America. The theoretical perspective adopted is that of constructive alignment (Biggs, 2014; Biggs & Tang, 2011), distinguishing between formal documentary coherence and effective alignment among outcomes, teaching activities, and assessment. The study draws on two primary institutional sources from the academic period 2025.1; a semester report on monitoring and evaluation of the teaching process, and a competency-based curricular evaluation document. Methodologically, a qualitative-descriptive strategy was implemented, triangulating quantitative evidence (review matrices, grades, and rubrics) and qualitative evidence (committee observations, teacher hetero-evaluation, and student focus groups). Findings show a high level of formal alignment between syllabi and learning outcomes (scores ranging from 3.8 to 4.0 out of 4), along with positive academic performance indicators (overall average grade of 8.34/10 and a 100% pass rate). However, tensions in implementation are identified that reveal the gap between documentary coherence and effective learning experience: a demand for more instructional hours in highly complex courses, a need for additional practical activities and real-life cases, and a still uneven use of bibliographic and technological resources. It is noted that academic performance is used as an approximation of achieving learning outcomes, which constitutes a conceptual limitation of the study. It is concluded that formal alignment is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for constructive alignment, and it is proposed to strengthen curriculum evaluation as a continuous, participatory and formative process, with greater articulation between pedagogical evidence, teacher professional development and the social relevance of competencies.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 William Aguas , Cristian Valles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto
Aquellos autores o autoras que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores o autoras conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores o autoras podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores o autoras difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).








